What Projector Screen Should I Buy

adoption, the Supreme Court corrects the press but the hoax continues secularist

adoption, the Supreme Court corrects the press but the hoax continues secularist

The Supreme Court backtracks on adoption for singles: "No stress on legislators' . We could say that adjustment, or corrects or contradicts those secularists in breathless news agencies that want nothing more than distort the news to cultivate their ideology (as we have shown for example in very latest 25/11/10) http://www.uccronline.it/2010/11/25/smascherato-un-tentativo-laicista-di-screditare-la-chiesa-ecco-come-funziona/ . Yes, because the news that the Supreme Court has blatantly open to singles seems more of a journalistic hoax. In fact, everything is born to a case in which an Italian woman has called for a Russian girl. And the Supreme Court rejected the request claiming that the adoption of minors, Italian or foreign, can not be accorded to individuals. He then largely rejected the request. Perhaps, as reconstructed Future http://www.avvenire.it/Commenti/editoriale+anzani+adozioni+single+cassazione_201102160749266400000.htm , somebody wanted to exaggerate a little clumsy exit of the Supreme Court, which nell’ultima frase della sentenza dice che la Convenzione di Strasburgo del 1967 lascia al legislatore nazionale la facoltà di ampliare l’adozione legittimante, se volesse ammettervi i singoli. Qualcuno ha così colto l’occasione per accendere il falò di una rivoluzione. Oggi però la Cassazione è intervenuta nuovamente, sottolineando che il senso della frase non corrisponde a come certa stampa lo ha interpretato: «non c’è stato alcun invito al legislatore da parte della Corte di Cassazione in materia di adozione» .

Alcuni quotidiani però, con La Stampa e La Repubblica in testa, continuano ad intervistare dolcissime donne e uomini single and propagate the slogan: "better than leaving them in a single institution, or called" principle of the lesser evil. " All seasoned with a lot of sentimentality and justified by the notorious act of love that recalls the motivation for passing the state euthanasia. For example, is interviewed on the subject Minister Prestigiacomo http://www.lastampa.it/_web/CMSTP/tmplrubriche/giornalisti/grubrica.asp?ID_blog=251&ID_articolo=79&ID_sezione=554 & section = , and she reiterates: "It is clear that it is better that a child is with one parent rather in an institution, but the problem is not to be put in these terms. In Italy there are many more couples willing to adopt than children adoptable. The real priority is the adoption of the single but then are the criteria that make an adoptable child in our country are still too rigid. When it comes to adoptions must always think about what is best for the child and is no doubt that for those who have already suffered the trauma of the best solution is a family of a father and a mother ". And again: "And 'better for a child be placed with a family. Single people who want to adopt have good intentions, is that they do so to meet a need for maternity or paternity leave, whether you do it to do good. But for the child is better to be welcomed into a family full ". Insists "The current law is correct with regard to the adoption because the single is already covered in special cases when the emotional relationship with the adopter is stable and durable, and prior to the loss of his parents' . The position of Prestigiacomo is so clear and understandable: it is better that a single orphanage. But in Italy, married couples who want to take many and all are on hold. So the "alleged" openness is unnecessary and wrong because the law still allows already. But you know how it is titled the article? So: "Minister Prestigiacomo:" Better a single parent in school "» . That is, how to channel public opinion and hope that someone will stop to read just the titles. This is the secularist ideology.

On each return, however, today's experts (in addition to those gathered yesterday in very latest 15/2/11) http://www.uccronline.it/2011/02/15/adozioni-la- Supreme-open-to-single-but-the-experts-refuse / :

The President of the Forum of Family Associations , Francesco Belletti says: "in exceptional cases, the law already allows adoption by single, but stresses that these cases must remain, of course, exceptions and not become an improper claim to pick an enlargement of the meshes of the law ' . In first place is the right of the child "to have a father and a mother who look after him 'and not, however, the ' desire of prospective parents' .

The columnist of Il Giornale , Marcello Veneziani, writes an excellent commentary http://rassegna.governo.it/rs_pdf/pdf/XI8/XI8KM.pdf : "Better a foster parent to the orphanage. Better an adopted son claw alone. Better to encourage the creation of emotional bonds, mutual solidarity. I agree with adoptions extended to singles. Provided that you reaffirm a basic level of priority: priority to the family, which offers more guarantees of solidity, then unmarried couples, then the single. No discrimination, but a scale of primary love interest of the child. Instead, if you read the comments of the moralists AC, you realize that the thin veneer of love covers a deep layer of hatred against the traditional family, first, then against the Church, the government and Parliament, and in favor, but look a bit, and magistrates. The argument they used is a good reason to refuse adoptions to singles. Here it is: but who says that a real family is better than an individual, we are sure that a couple is better than one? Gentlemen, we know that humanity is diverse, there are families of hell, like shit or couples on the verge of separating. But we know that by nature and culture, second life, history and tradition, the creatures are born and grow up in families and in need of a father and a mother. That 's what their riverbed habitat on that element we were born and raised, on that basis is based civilization. Then, of course, families can be bad or smashed, such as single or bad can be grim. But the law, and logic, part of the standard and then compare with what denies. But no, we want to overturn the law, life, logic, starting in reverse. Here is the perfidy and hatred that they shield the child. A nice shot in the traditional family, the Church, religion, government. And once again, the courts do not enforce the law but invented, will replace the legislative power. "

Even the 'double Italian Association is contrary to the opening singles, for two reasons, says the president Gian Ettore Gassani: "should amend the Constitution and change the features of the concept of family" . The

welfare minister, Maurizio Sacconi , says be witnessing a "dangerous drift licista. The same minister rules out new legislation about adoptions and insists that "as early as next week there will be an opportunity for a strong signal by the Parliament to confirm the value of life." .

The President UDC, Rocco Buttiglione , critical judges that "should not make undue interference in the legislative field that it is for Parliament ". Again: "The legislature should not lay the ground for the creation of new emotional ties that do not correspond to the interest of the child, who is entitled to a father and a mother" .