adoption, the Supreme Court corrects the press but the hoax continues secularist

adoption, the Supreme Court corrects the press but the hoax continues secularist

The Supreme Court backtracks on adoption for singles: "No stress on legislators' . We could say that adjustment, or corrects or contradicts those secularists in breathless news agencies that want nothing more than distort the news to cultivate their ideology (as we have shown for example in very latest 25/11/10) http://www.uccronline.it/2010/11/25/smascherato-un-tentativo-laicista-di-screditare-la-chiesa-ecco-come-funziona/ . Yes, because the news that the Supreme Court has blatantly open to singles seems more of a journalistic hoax. In fact, everything is born to a case in which an Italian woman has called for a Russian girl. And the Supreme Court rejected the request claiming that the adoption of minors, Italian or foreign, can not be accorded to individuals. He then largely rejected the request. Perhaps, as reconstructed Future http://www.avvenire.it/Commenti/editoriale+anzani+adozioni+single+cassazione_201102160749266400000.htm , somebody wanted to exaggerate a little clumsy exit of the Supreme Court, which nell’ultima frase della sentenza dice che la Convenzione di Strasburgo del 1967 lascia al legislatore nazionale la facoltà di ampliare l’adozione legittimante, se volesse ammettervi i singoli. Qualcuno ha così colto l’occasione per accendere il falò di una rivoluzione. Oggi però la Cassazione è intervenuta nuovamente, sottolineando che il senso della frase non corrisponde a come certa stampa lo ha interpretato: «non c’è stato alcun invito al legislatore da parte della Corte di Cassazione in materia di adozione» .

Alcuni quotidiani però, con La Stampa e La Repubblica in testa, continuano ad intervistare dolcissime donne e uomini single and propagate the slogan: "better than leaving them in a single institution, or called" principle of the lesser evil. " All seasoned with a lot of sentimentality and justified by the notorious act of love that recalls the motivation for passing the state euthanasia. For example, is interviewed on the subject Minister Prestigiacomo http://www.lastampa.it/_web/CMSTP/tmplrubriche/giornalisti/grubrica.asp?ID_blog=251&ID_articolo=79&ID_sezione=554 & section = , and she reiterates: "It is clear that it is better that a child is with one parent rather in an institution, but the problem is not to be put in these terms. In Italy there are many more couples willing to adopt than children adoptable. The real priority is the adoption of the single but then are the criteria that make an adoptable child in our country are still too rigid. When it comes to adoptions must always think about what is best for the child and is no doubt that for those who have already suffered the trauma of the best solution is a family of a father and a mother ". And again: "And 'better for a child be placed with a family. Single people who want to adopt have good intentions, is that they do so to meet a need for maternity or paternity leave, whether you do it to do good. But for the child is better to be welcomed into a family full ". Insists "The current law is correct with regard to the adoption because the single is already covered in special cases when the emotional relationship with the adopter is stable and durable, and prior to the loss of his parents' . The position of Prestigiacomo is so clear and understandable: it is better that a single orphanage. But in Italy, married couples who want to take many and all are on hold. So the "alleged" openness is unnecessary and wrong because the law still allows already. But you know how it is titled the article? So: "Minister Prestigiacomo:" Better a single parent in school "» . That is, how to channel public opinion and hope that someone will stop to read just the titles. This is the secularist ideology.

On each return, however, today's experts (in addition to those gathered yesterday in very latest 15/2/11) http://www.uccronline.it/2011/02/15/adozioni-la- Supreme-open-to-single-but-the-experts-refuse / :

The President of the Forum of Family Associations , Francesco Belletti says: "in exceptional cases, the law already allows adoption by single, but stresses that these cases must remain, of course, exceptions and not become an improper claim to pick an enlargement of the meshes of the law ' . In first place is the right of the child "to have a father and a mother who look after him 'and not, however, the ' desire of prospective parents' .

The columnist of Il Giornale , Marcello Veneziani, writes an excellent commentary http://rassegna.governo.it/rs_pdf/pdf/XI8/XI8KM.pdf : "Better a foster parent to the orphanage. Better an adopted son claw alone. Better to encourage the creation of emotional bonds, mutual solidarity. I agree with adoptions extended to singles. Provided that you reaffirm a basic level of priority: priority to the family, which offers more guarantees of solidity, then unmarried couples, then the single. No discrimination, but a scale of primary love interest of the child. Instead, if you read the comments of the moralists AC, you realize that the thin veneer of love covers a deep layer of hatred against the traditional family, first, then against the Church, the government and Parliament, and in favor, but look a bit, and magistrates. The argument they used is a good reason to refuse adoptions to singles. Here it is: but who says that a real family is better than an individual, we are sure that a couple is better than one? Gentlemen, we know that humanity is diverse, there are families of hell, like shit or couples on the verge of separating. But we know that by nature and culture, second life, history and tradition, the creatures are born and grow up in families and in need of a father and a mother. That 's what their riverbed habitat on that element we were born and raised, on that basis is based civilization. Then, of course, families can be bad or smashed, such as single or bad can be grim. But the law, and logic, part of the standard and then compare with what denies. But no, we want to overturn the law, life, logic, starting in reverse. Here is the perfidy and hatred that they shield the child. A nice shot in the traditional family, the Church, religion, government. And once again, the courts do not enforce the law but invented, will replace the legislative power. "

Even the 'double Italian Association is contrary to the opening singles, for two reasons, says the president Gian Ettore Gassani: "should amend the Constitution and change the features of the concept of family" . The

welfare minister, Maurizio Sacconi , says be witnessing a "dangerous drift licista. The same minister rules out new legislation about adoptions and insists that "as early as next week there will be an opportunity for a strong signal by the Parliament to confirm the value of life." .

The President UDC, Rocco Buttiglione , critical judges that "should not make undue interference in the legislative field that it is for Parliament ". Again: "The legislature should not lay the ground for the creation of new emotional ties that do not correspond to the interest of the child, who is entitled to a father and a mother" .

Russia: 20 years after the end of atheism, the government is increasingly Christian

Russia: 20 years after the end of atheism, the government is increasingly Christian

The great promise of the Russian premier, Vladimir Putin has been maintained: a law, passed by the Duma with the only "no" Communists have returned to the Orthodox Church the immense wealth seized with violence and ruthless regime of Soviet-atheist. A special committee is already starting to deal with the return of other assets: 1600 churches and buildings around the country and a treasure yet to be an inventory of sacred objects and icons kept in the most prestigious museums in Moscow and St. Petersburg. A historic victory for the Russian Church, La Repubblica reported http://www.scribd.com/doc/45713593/La-Santa-Alleanza-tra-Putin-ed-il-Patriarca - just vent out of hiding 'years ago when the decision by Gorbachev to return to citizens freedom of thought and religion went around the world and gave a further sign of the imminent end of the USSR. In a paese dominato per più di settant’anni da un fallimentare laicismo di Stato, dal divieto di credere in Dio, si assiste lentamente alla ri-conversione del popolo, del governo e dei suoi uomini più rappresentativi. Anzi, una vera e propria alleanza con la Chiesa Ortodossa, Nel 1922, nel pieno della carestia e della rivolta dei kulaki, l’ateissimo Lenin ordinò di «espropriare i beni della Chiesa con la più brutale e selvaggia energia» , monasteri, pii istituti e varie proprietà ecclesiastiche furono distrutti o riconvertiti. Stalin, feroce ateo, rinchiuse e perseguitò ogni uomo di fede religiosa. Oggi invece si dice che Putin ostenti sempre più una fede che per anni deve aver evidentemente kept secret, making knowledgeable surprised by television crews as he prays in solitude in a small country church. Not to mention the line of thought with the Patriarch Cyril. It 'was his speech last year to reject the abolition of word "God" in post-Soviet version of the National Anthem (as it was rejected in the United States of altraparte). Also Prime Minister has championed the return time of religion in primary schools. For those who have lived with militant atheism, that is the desperate attempt to create a society without God knows how deep this ideology of evil can to arrive. So even Russia, like China, both marked by the explosion of atheism, are increasingly willing slowly rediscovered Christianity.

The Blog Of Riccardo Di Giuseppe

Friday, February 25, 2011

Salomon Salvage Black

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

What Projector Screen Should I Buy

adoption, the Supreme Court corrects the press but the hoax continues secularist

Blueprints For Small Offices

Russia: 20 years after the end of atheism, the government is increasingly Christian