Saturday, June 26, 2010
Is It Unhealthy To Sit Next To Printers
Globalizzazione ineluttabile, forma imperiale (USA) dell’internalizzazione, crisi dello stato nazione, limiti della sovranità novecentesca, crisi economica, debito pubblico e stato sociale, crisi delle classi medie ecc. a partire http://www.cceia.org/resources/transcripts/4424.html Brezinskj the book "The Choice". And this is after a long search the text of the speech to
http://www.chathamhouse.org.uk/files/13106_85_1brzezinski.pdf
Chatham House.
then see all on face book on my pages.
In Italian the book came from Salerno with the headline "Last Chance". Here's a card:
's work. Thorough and dispassionate analysis of the results produced by the three presidents who, for the first time in history, played consecutively on the role of global leaders, and the manner in which the personal style of leadership each has influenced these results. Among the most influential commentators on American foreign policy, Brzezinski argues that the Member U.S. has badly spent much of their power and prestige. None of the three presidents escapes criticism, despite the author ascribes to each a different degree of responsibility. Goal, but scathing, this book is a reference to the constructive global role of America in the near future.
the author. Zbigniew Brzezinski, former National Security Adviser, is currently a consultant at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies and a professor of American foreign policy at the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins
Friday, June 25, 2010
Does Miosotis Still Alive
Century Art published on June 10, 2010
This is an article that tries di riparare ad un torto commesso da me, forse, a parziale scusa, in compagnia di altri studiosi coinvolti, a vario titolo, in affari internazionale. Come sempre, quando succede qualcosa al di là del Mediterraneo, mi riferisco ai fatti a largo di Gaza, sono andato a vedere cosa dicesse al riguardo il professor Fred Halliday, uno dei più grandi esperti del mondo di questioni medio orientali, ed ho scoperto che se ne era andato, stroncato da un tumore, a Barcellona quasi due mesi fa. Chiunque studioso o semplicemente appassionato di politica si fosse avvicinato agli affari e alla storia del Medio Oriente avrebbe incontrato sul suo cammino la figura di Fred Halliday, il socialista irlandese conoscitore di più di 10 lingue, dal persiano all'arabo passando per tutti i dialetti, che dal fatidico 1968 si occupava di quel mondo. Avevo iniziato a conoscerlo su "Quaderni piacentini", la rivista di estrema sinistra vicino al filone operaista fondata e diretta da Piergiorgio Bellocchio fino al 1980, e poi ho seguito il suo percorso di grande conoscitore di Medio Oriente nei suoi libri e nei commenti on line sul sito Open Democracy
( http://www.opendemocracy.net/author/fred-halliday )
Nonostante gli anni, Halliday era rimasto di sinistra, in quel modo che solo un anglosassone sa e può esserlo. Libero da schemi nelle analisi teoriche ma con giudizi politici sull'attualità al limite dello scontato, simile in questo all'altra famous English scholar of international relations, Mary Kaldor, could fly high or fly heads unworthy of the plan. His mastery of the subject and as a powerful antidote to the ideologies of pragmatism, however, made him immune from historical and analytical simplifications, indeed seemed frankly amazing how much insight is accompanied by a choir result of political legacy of the past.
We like to be remembered not so much for the impromptu reviews, but for the depth of gaze. Take for example his latest book published in Italian, "The Middle East. Power, politics and ideology" (Life and Thought, 2007), here the professor Irish produce a key reading can hold together the various phenomena and jagged range from Ankara cha going from Jerusalem to Kabul. By the end of the cold facts together in different parts of the world far away from each other and with different explanations have been making a weld blending a specific crisis with the result of making a new area and wide area of \u200b\u200bcrisis, "the Greater Middle East" or "Middle East". The process of modernization in those countries, thrown into a globalization without ideological boundaries, has unleashed a series of reactions and counter reactions from telluric, komen with the revolution of the eighties, the entry of religion in politics and eventually put crisis in the same structure heavily Institutional product par excellence of modernity: the nation state. The revolution growth, the expulsion of the Soviets in Kabul, the strength of Hezbollah in Lebanon, the rise of al Qaeda, the Gulf Wars have ended up producing a single puzzle where each piece is held together with the other seamlessly . "An incremental process of joint regional crisis, slow but sure" is going to occur both locally and at international level to end at the same perceptions and popular narratives where Palestine, Iraq and Afghanistan have become the cause all related. But the process of unification of geopolitics, and internalization of the area, is not synonymous total replacement of power dynamics twentieth century, the construction of the "Greater Middle East" is in fact went hand in hand with social disruption and the struggle for greater regional influence, if not hegemony, by former state actors, once allies West, first to Persia and now Turkey.
If it is always difficult to predict the future, the outcome of these processes with different lines of force between them will still be able to create a series of continuous transformations in a crisis continues where it appears to be difficult to locate the point of equilibrium, Starting with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the Iranian nuclear issue. If a historical point of view the Israeli political is right to argue that the Palestinian issue has nothing to do with the Sept. 11, what is certain is that ideology and globalization will be produced on the fragile Arab Muslim identity is very different results. This analysis is the best legacy he left us Fred Halliday.
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
Bath Toys Water Wheel
- Here the text of the interview interview with Rolling Stone magazine. A mystery why it was emedded and the circle of the commander in chief a journalist and pacifist anti coin. Blissful naivety, but still alive transparency USA!
- President Barack Obama will meet Thursday Mc Crystal dopo le dichiarazioni fortemente critiche contro l'amministrazione fatte dallo stesso generale. All'incontro saranno presenti.
Vice President Joe Biden
Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State
Timothy Geithner, Secretary of the Treasury
Robert Gates, Secretary of Defense
Rahm Emanuel, Chief of Staff
General James Jones, National Security Advisor
Tom Donilon, Deputy National Security Advisor
John Brennan, Homeland Security and Counterterrorism Advisor
Ambassador Susan Rice, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations
David Gompert, Acting Director of National Intelligence
Leon Panetta, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency
Rajiv Shah, Administrator, USAID
James Steinberg, Deputy Secretary of State
Admiral Michael Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
General James Cartwright, Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
Ambassador Richard Holbrooke, Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan
Doug Lute, Coordinator for Afghanistan and Pakistan
John Tien, Senior Director for Afghanistan and Pakistan
General David Petraeus, U.S. Central Command
General Stanley McChrystal, Commander, International Security Assistance Force and Commander, U.S. Forces Afghanistan
Ambassador Karl Eikenberry, U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan (via videoconference)
Ambassador Anne Patterson, U.S. Ambassador to Pakistan (via videoconference)
Andrew J. Bacevich, Boston University
Kori Schake, Hoover Institution
Julian E. Zelizer, professor of history and public affairs
James Morin, Truman National Security Project
Robert Haddick, managing editor, Small Wars Journal
Nathaniel Fick, Center for a New American Security
- Chi potrebbe sostituire McCrystal? Si dice LTG David Rodriguez, McChrystal deputy, Rodriguez may be suspect , forse James Mattis.
Per un bel precedente di scontro tra civili e militari americani durante una guerra si rimanda al 1951, alla guerra di Corea, al furioso incidente tra il presidente Truman e il Generale McArthur che voleva usare la bomba atomica per fermare i cinesi.