P90x Lightscribe Template

Computers and Internet




















Even our computer station + internet can be Nourish solar photovoltaic .

It can be achieved with simplicity and a few components with independent electrical generator powered by solar energy produced by a small photovoltaic panel .
Questa applicazione, oltre che molto utile per chi ha specifiche esigenze d'utilizzo mobile/portatile, può anche essere utilizzata tutti i giorni sia a casa che al lavoro.

Risparmio energetico ed autoproduzione d'energia elettrica da fonti pulite e rinnovabili sono inoltre le ottime caratteristiche e prerogative "green" di questa applicazione fotovoltaica.

I componenti necessari per la realizzazione di questo "generatore ad energia solare" sono i seguenti:

- un pannello solare (di tipo flessibile e leggero);

- un regolatore di carica;

- una batteria a 12Volt;

- a 12V power outlet (like those used in cars).

All the above components are connected (via the household electrical cable section of 1.5 sq. mm.) matching the polarities (+) and (-) terminals appropriately indicated in the charge controller.

I oreover, thanks to the storage battery, we can use electricity from the sun even in the evening / night or during cloudy days.

Here is the station "PC solar active and connected:

For more information on this realization solar energy see the detail page at the following link: http://www.wutel.net / gps40





__________________________________________
http://www.wutel.net/

Difference Between Oral Thrush And Leukoplakia

Dimissioni di Mc Crystal e situzione afghana

June 25, 2010, The Western

What is being discussed as a result of unfortunate utterances of General Mc Crystal does not apply to a case of insubordination, but the opinion of the situation in Afghanistan . In other words, the strategy developed by the general model of the famous surge tested by Petraeus in Iraq is valid for Kabul? And, if so, is it working?
can, apparently, two questions seem similar, but in fact here you are talking about two different things, if that policy objectives are correct and if the military strategy chosen to achieve those goals is the correct one. E 'was Clausewitz theorized clearly for the first time the difference between political aims and military objectives, between politics and war by stating forcefully that the latter is required to achieve the goals that the policy is given. We Westerners are accustomed to consider the model of wars on the European experience of the terrible destruction of the twentieth century, conflicts that saw total mobilization and where the political aim, the liberation from Nazi fascist tyranny, coincided with the military aim: the destruction of enemy forces to surrender unconditionally. But this is not the case with modern warfare. In Afghanistan, the transition from political to military decision is not immediate because the political end must be able to select the precise military objective and be consistent with it.
And here comes the interview with Mc Crystal because it has highlighted the diversity of their opinions on both the political ends that the objectives of the Afghan campaign. The first finding is a simple fact: the offensive Marja is not giving the desired results, the Karzai government is in a sorry state poised between corruption, drug trafficking and impotence, the Afghan army is not yet able to fight alone, the borders with Pakistan have a runny broth and secret services of Karachi's not clear which side are, whether with the Taliban in anti India or with allies.
those circumstances, what are the possible targets so that we can declare a semblance of victory and begin withdrawing the bulk of the troops? This is the point: what constitutes victory? E 'credible counterinsurgency that succeeds action that is based on creating a strong and stable central government and the conquest of the people's consent? Or be content to hold off the Taliban con azioni di truppe speciali, uccisioni mirate con i droni, oppure addirittura a lasciare loro il terreno ma limitarsi a colpire i più estremisti e vicini ad Al Qaida ?
Domande non facili, ma prima di ridurre lo scontro tra McCrystal e Obama ad un semplice atto di ribellione o ad un gesto di ingenuità, è necessario rispondere con attenzione alle domande che la guerra in Asia centrale solleva.

Teacher Letter About Wedding

A Winnable War

A Winnable War

Is It Unhealthy To Sit Next To Printers

Brezinski è sempre Brezinski. Si può esseree in disaccordo ma è innegabile l’artiglio dell’aquila

Globalizzazione ineluttabile, forma imperiale (USA) dell’internalizzazione, crisi dello stato nazione, limiti della sovranità novecentesca, crisi economica, debito pubblico e stato sociale, crisi delle classi medie ecc. a partire http://www.cceia.org/resources/transcripts/4424.html Brezinskj the book "The Choice". And this is after a long search the text of the speech to
http://www.chathamhouse.org.uk/files/13106_85_1brzezinski.pdf
Chatham House.
then see all on face book on my pages.
In Italian the book came from Salerno with the headline "Last Chance". Here's a card:
's work. Thorough and dispassionate analysis of the results produced by the three presidents who, for the first time in history, played consecutively on the role of global leaders, and the manner in which the personal style of leadership each has influenced these results. Among the most influential commentators on American foreign policy, Brzezinski argues that the Member U.S. has badly spent much of their power and prestige. None of the three presidents escapes criticism, despite the author ascribes to each a different degree of responsibility. Goal, but scathing, this book is a reference to the constructive global role of America in the near future.

the author. Zbigniew Brzezinski, former National Security Adviser, is currently a consultant at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies and a professor of American foreign policy at the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins

Does Miosotis Still Alive

In memoria di Fred Halliday, uno dei più grandi studiosi di medio Oriente

Century Art published on June 10, 2010

This is an article that tries di riparare ad un torto commesso da me, forse, a parziale scusa, in compagnia di altri studiosi coinvolti, a vario titolo, in affari internazionale. Come sempre, quando succede qualcosa al di là del Mediterraneo, mi riferisco ai fatti a largo di Gaza, sono andato a vedere cosa dicesse al riguardo il professor Fred Halliday, uno dei più grandi esperti del mondo di questioni medio orientali, ed ho scoperto che se ne era andato, stroncato da un tumore, a Barcellona quasi due mesi fa. Chiunque studioso o semplicemente appassionato di politica si fosse avvicinato agli affari e alla storia del Medio Oriente avrebbe incontrato sul suo cammino la figura di Fred Halliday, il socialista irlandese conoscitore di più di 10 lingue, dal persiano all'arabo passando per tutti i dialetti, che dal fatidico 1968 si occupava di quel mondo. Avevo iniziato a conoscerlo su "Quaderni piacentini", la rivista di estrema sinistra vicino al filone operaista fondata e diretta da Piergiorgio Bellocchio fino al 1980, e poi ho seguito il suo percorso di grande conoscitore di Medio Oriente nei suoi libri e nei commenti on line sul sito Open Democracy
( http://www.opendemocracy.net/author/fred-halliday )

Nonostante gli anni, Halliday era rimasto di sinistra, in quel modo che solo un anglosassone sa e può esserlo. Libero da schemi nelle analisi teoriche ma con giudizi politici sull'attualità al limite dello scontato, simile in questo all'altra famous English scholar of international relations, Mary Kaldor, could fly high or fly heads unworthy of the plan. His mastery of the subject and as a powerful antidote to the ideologies of pragmatism, however, made him immune from historical and analytical simplifications, indeed seemed frankly amazing how much insight is accompanied by a choir result of political legacy of the past.

We like to be remembered not so much for the impromptu reviews, but for the depth of gaze. Take for example his latest book published in Italian, "The Middle East. Power, politics and ideology" (Life and Thought, 2007), here the professor Irish produce a key reading can hold together the various phenomena and jagged range from Ankara cha going from Jerusalem to Kabul. By the end of the cold facts together in different parts of the world far away from each other and with different explanations have been making a weld blending a specific crisis with the result of making a new area and wide area of \u200b\u200bcrisis, "the Greater Middle East" or "Middle East". The process of modernization in those countries, thrown into a globalization without ideological boundaries, has unleashed a series of reactions and counter reactions from telluric, komen with the revolution of the eighties, the entry of religion in politics and eventually put crisis in the same structure heavily Institutional product par excellence of modernity: the nation state. The revolution growth, the expulsion of the Soviets in Kabul, the strength of Hezbollah in Lebanon, the rise of al Qaeda, the Gulf Wars have ended up producing a single puzzle where each piece is held together with the other seamlessly . "An incremental process of joint regional crisis, slow but sure" is going to occur both locally and at international level to end at the same perceptions and popular narratives where Palestine, Iraq and Afghanistan have become the cause all related. But the process of unification of geopolitics, and internalization of the area, is not synonymous total replacement of power dynamics twentieth century, the construction of the "Greater Middle East" is in fact went hand in hand with social disruption and the struggle for greater regional influence, if not hegemony, by former state actors, once allies West, first to Persia and now Turkey.

If it is always difficult to predict the future, the outcome of these processes with different lines of force between them will still be able to create a series of continuous transformations in a crisis continues where it appears to be difficult to locate the point of equilibrium, Starting with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the Iranian nuclear issue. If a historical point of view the Israeli political is right to argue that the Palestinian issue has nothing to do with the Sept. 11, what is certain is that ideology and globalization will be produced on the fragile Arab Muslim identity is very different results. This analysis is the best legacy he left us Fred Halliday.

Bath Toys Water Wheel

UN PO’ SU MC CRYSTAL

• Here the text of the interview interview with Rolling Stone magazine. A mystery why it was emedded and the circle of the commander in chief a journalist and pacifist anti coin. Blissful naivety, but still alive transparency USA!
  
• President Barack Obama will meet Thursday Mc Crystal dopo le dichiarazioni fortemente critiche contro l'amministrazione fatte dallo stesso generale. All'incontro saranno presenti.
  

Vice President Joe Biden
Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State
Timothy Geithner, Secretary of the Treasury
Robert Gates, Secretary of Defense
Rahm Emanuel, Chief of Staff
General James Jones, National Security Advisor
Tom Donilon, Deputy National Security Advisor
John Brennan, Homeland Security and Counterterrorism Advisor
Ambassador Susan Rice, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations
David Gompert, Acting Director of National Intelligence
Leon Panetta, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency
Rajiv Shah, Administrator, USAID
James Steinberg, Deputy Secretary of State
Admiral Michael Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
General James Cartwright, Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
Ambassador Richard Holbrooke, Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan
Doug Lute, Coordinator for Afghanistan and Pakistan
John Tien, Senior Director for Afghanistan and Pakistan
General David Petraeus, U.S. Central Command 
General Stanley McChrystal, Commander, International Security Assistance Force and Commander, U.S. Forces Afghanistan
Ambassador Karl Eikenberry, U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan (via videoconference)
Ambassador Anne Patterson, U.S. Ambassador to Pakistan (via videoconference)

• be read carefully reviews of the following commentators:
  

Andrew J. Bacevich, Boston University

Kori Schake, Hoover Institution

Julian E. Zelizer, professor of history and public affairs

James Morin, Truman National Security Project

Robert Haddick, managing editor, Small Wars Journal

Nathaniel Fick, Center for a New American Security

 

• Chi potrebbe sostituire McCrystal? Si dice LTG  David Rodriguez,  McChrystal deputy, Rodriguez may be suspect , forse   James Mattis.
  

Per un bel precedente di scontro tra civili e militari americani durante una guerra si rimanda al 1951, alla guerra di Corea, al furioso incidente tra il presidente Truman e il Generale McArthur che voleva usare la bomba atomica per fermare i cinesi.

Treadmill Dizzy After Cool Down

Una splendida canzone, meglio se cantata da Johnny Cash

Nick Cave, The mercy seat

It all began when they took me from my home
And put me on Death Row,
A crime for which I am totally innocent, you know.

I began to warm and chill
To objects and their fields,
A ragged cup, a twisted mop
The face of Jesus in my soup
Those sinister dinner deals
The meal trolley's wicked wheels
A hooked bone rising from my food
And all things either good or ungood.

And the mercy seat is waiting
And I think my head is burning
And in a way I'm yearning
To be done with all this weighing of the truth.
An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth
And anyway I told the truth
And I'm not afraid to die.

I hear stories from the chamber
Christ was born into a manger
And like some ragged stranger
He died upon the cross
Might I say it seems so fitting in its way
He was a carpenter by trade
Or at least that's what I'm told

My kill hand's tatooed E.V.I.L.
Across it's brother's fist
That filthy five!
They did nothing to challenge or resist.

In Heaven His throne is made of gold
The ark of his Testament is stowed
A throne from which I'm told
All history does unfold.
It's made of wood and wire
And my body is on fire
And God is never far away.

Into the mercy seat I climb
My head is shaved, my head is wired
And like a moth that tries
To enter the bright eye
I go shuffling out of life
Just to hide in death awhile
And anyway I never lied.

And the mercy seat is waiting
And I think my head is burning
And in a way I'm yearning
To be done with all this weighing of the truth.
An eye for an eye
And a tooth for a tooth
And anyway I told the truth
And I'm not afraid to die.

And the mercy seat is burning
And I think my head is glowing
And in a way I'm hoping
To be done with all this twisting of the truth.
An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth
And anyway there was no proof
And I'm not afraid to die.

And the mercy seat is glowing
And I think my head is smoking
And in a way I'm hoping
To be done with all these looks of disbelief.
A life for a life and a truth for a truth
And I've got nothing left to lose
And I'm not afraid to die.

And the mercy seat is smoking
And I think my head is melting
And in a way that's helping
To be done with all this twisting of the truth.
An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth
And anyway I told the truth
But I'm afraid I Told a lie.

Quote For 3rd Birthday

VOTE LAST NAME REGISTRATION

(voting is already inclusive of any two points of the presentation (project) in the classroom)

24 Adam Daniel
140329 19 149538 Emanuela Altar
30 Armao Erica
150195 25 148050
Bagnera Cinzia n Ballario Marco
140413 146822 22 Baraboo Andrei
29 Simone Battle
18 131260 1510184
20 Bodritti Bersichelli Silvia Alberto Alessandro Bulgarelli 25
149209 148892 149034
Lorella Buso
29 29 21 Cagnin Enrico Calabrese Federico
150119 140845 123598 Mirko
n Cerroni Emanuele
18 Ciarnelli
147988 111534
n n Rocco Ciccone Stefano Ciccone
148513 18 132332 Cotrufo Francis
n Curetti Amber
149186 18 150197
n Damiano Marco Alberto De Mattei 150271
19 Dell 'Anna Mirko
149134 21 150217 Delpiano Gabriele Antonello Di Bello
22 24 149 489
Falla Armando Ferraro Roberto 133274 149522
Nc Federica Ferri
18 139962 152488
n Floris Alessandro
Amber Foley 21 19 141 369
Fusaro Luca Carlo Alberto
148619 27 149033 Valentina Gilli
30L Michele Graffi
149175 27 139666 Granara Giuseppe Pietro Grasso Claudia
18
149137 19 148669
n Locondolo Lanzafame Alberto Federico Rosa Mammoliti 140503 133762

18 25 148 246 Andrea Mariano Daniel Martis
19 23 149 303
Michelucci Tania Valeria 148508 148575

n Morello Claudio Roberto Ones 20 148594 137812
24 Pescetto Denis
n Petrarulo Claudio Valentina Pilo 23
132631 135402 149933
John Pizzolla
26 25 148 400 Andrea Pomero
n Pontrelli Alessandro
149528 18 149284 Rollino Alberto
21 Giulia Rossi Roberto Santoro n
148312 130554 149655
Luca Saraggi
25 23 Elena Scala 149911 Spampinato Diego
n n 140061
Matthew Trabucco 133902 149928
Vittorio Vergani
22 18 125 441 Alexander Viada

nc = not classified

The ratifications of the votes obtained, any oral evidence and the resulting recordings may be made on the dates and places of Prof. appeals officers. Marchis (ie not only during the appeals Industrial History in Italy, but I'm also in those of RIA technology ).

Chemical Reactions To Move A Car

ANCORA SULLE NAVI DEI “PACIFISTI”

"Reason alone is not enough, we must be able to win." If you wish to use a slogan that can be summed up in the strike situation in Israel this sentence is the ultimate synthesis. Otherwise, one might add, would be sufficient to morality, and doing so could undermine the role and policy space. If you want to understand something in the recent events off the coast of Gaza, all the drama of Israel is enclosed in this great difficulty in not being able to get out of a logic of moral law that sets the pattern syllogistic reasoning in a relentless, leaving no in his escape mechanism that begins with a moral premise to justify the use of the instrument of force as a method of conflict resolution. Rightly obsessed by the question of security, the Israeli government can not get out of a logic of military response even in fields that do not immediately put into question the safety of the Israeli state. The structure of the reasoning is always and only the following: "If I'm right, and I, if Israel is a sovereign state, and it is, the flotilla of peace in breach of an entirely legitimate military bloc, and then is making an illegal in which the state, the country of David, has the right to respond with force. "

Reasoning flawless but you forget the street a truth equally fundamental of modern conflicts where the field of battle from physical space emerges from the clash involved to engage the real space of world public opinion thanks to the speed of stratospheric media. Not to mention the hackneyed formulas of the "global village" or the wars in the age of CNN, but one thing is certain. In asymmetric wars, hybrid, post-modern or among people, space policy, and then communication is perhaps more important than physical strength. It 's always been that way since the war in Algeria, Vietnam when the battle is decided not only in the jungle or on the streets of the casbah, but in French and American plazas, courtyards of colleges, in the assembly UN in courtrooms. Armies invincible on the field had to retire defeated by adverse world opinion. Win from then on it was no longer synonymous with battles, fights to the death of muddy trenches. The victory smiled on the litigant who had more patience, who could make better use of the media, who could better manipulate world public opinion, to make people forget their massacres and to believe that their struggle had a liberating universal meaning.

Today, over fifty years ago that the role of media is far multiplied exponentially, the land of communication is found to be crucial to emerge victorious in a conflict. If Israel does not want to remain isolated in its battle to convince himself that not all conflicts require the use of force, and indeed the management of world public opinion is always essential, especially in conflicts fought "among the people" and hence the difficulty of Jerusalem. The image of the Jewish state, the heir of the Holocaust and formed in the clash with the Arab countries, has been transformed since the peace with Egypt, when the Israeli-Palestinian issue has taken precedence and since then the conflict management , although easier from a military standpoint, has become an issue between two parties and peoples to world public opinion, have been reversed: since the invasion of Lebanon, David '48 has become the Goliath that tramples the rights of the Palestinian people.

course it is not true! Of course, that killed more Palestinian Arabs that Israel, some Arab homosexuals fleeing from the territories to go to Jerusalem, true that the Palestinians are lining up to go for treatment in Israeli hospitals, to be sure that the anti-war organizations on ships belonging to wire Hamas! But what if nobody wants to see, if nobody wants to know? Sabra and Shatila, the two intifada, the Gaza War of 2006 have been manipulated for the consumption of political correctness ready to rely on the moral sensibilities of democracies regardless of the nature of enemy of truth. Little, however, are the complaints, this is the new battlefield.

Weighted Vests Basketball Dangerous

Israele e i “pacifisti”

Il Secolo d'Italy June 3, 2010

Israel is right. Are false peace, are waging a war under false pretenses. Hamas is quietly in the control room of the Turkish ships. Violating a blockade has serious implications that only the irresponsible and reckless, always ready to raise the finger of condemnation, it does not. And the Western European countries, with the press on the front line, ready and prone to make their own version of Hamas. This is why friends of Israel must now make their own voice,

All true, but not enough to be right, is useless. The asymmetric wars, modern wars - those troops are deployed in a democratic country against illegal militias in the middle between the army, organized gangs and militants of the party, new fighters who hide among the people - have one thing in contemporary conflicts terrible. You lose and you do not win militarily, that is, on the ground, but the policy level where the game is played by all means. The actor militarily weaker, the Palestinians and Hamas, will only seek confrontation certainly not on military grounds where Israel is infinitely stronger, technology, weapon systems and organization, but looking to weaken the will of the opponent through the international diplomatic isolation, the breakup of her domestic front, the conquest of world public opinion. It has been so skewed in any war or "among the people" since the war. And the first teachers in the management of international public opinion and diplomatic level as opposed to the material force of the Arabs were right, that the Algerian National Liberation Front, defeated always on the field, was able to forget, with the help of French paratroopers and their questionable methods, the horrible massacres of settlers and opponents of the destruction of villages. And then came the Vietnam with the world press sided with the Viet Cong not ready to see the horrors committed by the communists. But there is little to rail against the new rules of the game. The real truth is that the force and only one ingredient, a tool, of course necessary, but one of many. The use of civilians to shield themselves with innocent women and children, forcing the enemy to make more use of inhumane methods and contrary to international law, contrary to the conscience of a democratic country, is a definite policy of asymmetric adversaries. The aim is to fall in contradiction opponent, make him ashamed of himself, divide the population of the enemy, separate the government from the electorate, the army from his people. The purpose of the Viet Cong, the NLF, Hamas, Hezbollah is just the insulation del proprio avversario, attraverso un rovesciamento sapiente di ruoli. Questo è l'obiettivo più importante, dopo quello della difesa, che Israele deve contrastare con tutti i mezzi, rifiutando per quanto è possibile di cadere nelle provocazioni che non fanno altro che approfondire quella frattura morale dove i terroristi sguazzano.

E' sul fronte dei media, della diplomazia, di chi costruisce il consenso internazionale, che si svolge la battaglia strategica, non sul piano militare dove è necessario per Tel Aviv solo non perdere, e il fronte è molto più grande e complesso di poche migliaia di chilometri. Ed è su questo fronte che l'iniziativa dei commandos della marina e di chi li ha mandati era completamente wrong. What was, what Israel wanted to prove? Of course nobody wants to teach has always been a country struggling for its very existence to a people that has been forced to prove by force of arms the right to survival, what is good and what is bad, no one can know better than them. But if this observation is prudent in terms of deep motivations, and then leads us to look with respect even tragedies like this, one can not deal with on a rational level the level of relations between Palestinians and Israelis. This conflict has not only military in nature, but the political aspect at all times and goes through step by step the relations of force: see miolitareè always just looks wrong as counterproductive.

After what has happened, and who won Israel? Yet another debate on who's right and who's wrong? A diplomatic row with Turkey, the chill of Washington, the timid reaction of Europe? The manifestations of the usual anti-war? The general strike of the territories?

If a lesson is important to understand is that being right is not enough, you sapersela conquer and defend and that consent is sometimes more important than victory on the field. If the truth is that Israel is not Hamas want peace, which is not a problem of the occupied territories, as evidenced by the return of Gaza itself, now will only much more difficult to convince world public opinion with the result that feel increasingly isolated land of David. For this in such a difficult time for Israel's friends have to say that is wrong.

Hydrochloride-dihydrochloride

I FATTI A LARGO DI GAZA: LE RAGIONI DI ISRAELE E QUELLE DELLA POLITICA

June 3, 2010 The Western

the events that occurred off the coast of Gaza, the tragedy that is coming down again on those lands, you can watch all three legitimate points of view but which are liable if opposed, to play out of tune: the moral level, the legal one, and finally the political aspect. The first is the most fragile and it is necessarily to be dragged by the other, the second represented by international law but, as we know, in the absence of an arbitrator with real power, rule, only part of the totality of relationships, the last strategic plan is the political contest in which a master is by far is the reality principle.

The Israeli story, for it embodies the symbolic value, is likely to provoke heated debate and bring along with them a confusion with the result of plans to give reason for Hamas and Israel's enemies.

The truth is that the levels of the discussion should be clearly separated and particularly from the legal and strategic. Now looking at the aspect of international law that goes below the assessment morality, there is no doubt that Israel has acted to protect their interests and that the fleet of so-called peace activists were forcing a naval blockade in total disregard of international rules and those of common sense.

But this point of view solves the whole problem? No, it remains the policy level. On this level, you are right on the law and morals is not much and nothing will tell the Israeli commission of inquiry precisely because you are thinking of errors of assessment policy. Here is an obvious misunderstanding on the part of Tel Aviv of the threat posed by the protest sponsored by Turkey. The modern conflicts - "asymmetric", "hybrid" or "among the people" definiteli as you please-those who see a democratic face each other infinitely more powerful in terms of technology, weapon systems, organization and an opponent made up of irregular militias, have the particularity of not playing on the military. Indeed, because of the disproportion of forces and of the impossibility of arriving at a final military showdown, which would result in the defeat to the limits of the defeat of the weak and largely avoided by this fact, the purely military aspect is intended to fill a role secondary. Policy goes here all the time, at any time, the war by denying the saying that when the weapons speak, the policy is silent. Indeed, precisely because of the asymmetry of forces, the challenge of the democratic country will be using all possible means, just trying to circumvent and neutralize the disproportion of forces. The objective of the irregular and always will be only to prevent the army of a democratic country able to use the power it has. The means used will be the most diverse, but the purpose is always and only one: if you can not beat the strongest army in the field, you can tie or break the political will of that country. How? In two ways. Wearing out of the will to resist the democratic state, dropping the enemy at any provocation - using the most brutal terrorism, use of human shields, etc.-and forcing the army to use inhumane or illegal methods with the result of building a real moral wall between it and his country, allowing them to open an internal front, breaking the relationship between the armed forces, people and institutions, and here is the second mode, building a International barrier of mistrust between the state of democracy and international forum.

is nothing new. It 'been so in the war of Algeria, during the Vietnam conflict in Gaza in 2006. In these conflicts, the central mistake of the West, beyond the individual and huge differences and possible solutions and possible policy was to reduce the confrontation to a purely military matter and the enemy played a comparison the round by moving on several levels. Perhaps we have forgotten that the Battle of Algiers, coincided with the discussion of the issue to the UN in Algeria? Or words to that general of North Vietnam who candidly confessed to its corresponding U.S. to find out how the conflict would go every morning the staff listened to American radio in Hanoi? Or the ability of Hezbollah to pass themselves off as victims, bringing the arm D'Alema in Beirut and constructing scenes of bombing the ad hoc with the shoes of children who traveled from place to place depending on the needs of international TV?

The fact is that for Israel for many reasons to consider the complexity of modern "War among the people" is very difficult. To his mind, because Israel feels, rightly, the victim of history and therefore is used to fighting with their teeth for life and see every conflict as existential in terms of safety for the history of Israeli-Palestinian conflict legacy of war Israeli Arab armies faced each other where traditional to the nature of the confrontation with Hamas and Tel Aviv, and rightly so, because all currency insoluble nature of ideological religious and not political.

But if Israel does not want to start from scratch every time, in an endless game of goose, it should consider the multiple dimensions of strategy and understand that the management of public international media and diplomacy are facing perhaps the most important military confrontation where Palestinians are hardly in a position to threaten its existence.

Pay To Meet Milena Velba

Examination Results of the investigation 25 May 2010

VOTE LAST NAME
(voting is already inclusive of any two points of the presentation (project) in the classroom)

n / Adam Allard Cristian Danilo
24
n Altar Emanuela
Amorelli
25 18 Maria Laura Amoroso
n n Armao Erica
Artale Pamela
Badellino Micol
22 20 29 Bagnera Cinzia
Bagnoli
Carmine 19 Baraboo Andrei (score declined) James Barbagallo

21 23 22
Barbera Giorgia Andrea Barbero
26 Basadonna Marta
16 Davide Berruti
n Bersighelli Serena Silvia Bertola
30 22
Bodritti Alberto
n Boffa Matteo
15 Bonzi Silvia Luca Bruno

18 17 29
Buscemi Alessandro Bulgarelli Andrea Buso Lorella

20 n 16
Cagnin Enrico Calabrese Federico
Andrea Carbone
24 23 21 Causio
Dear Marta Letizia
Ciarnelli Emanuele
n n n
Ciccone Stefano Ciccone Rocco
n Cicerale Fabrizio
15 Francesca Cifarelli
Vittorio Colombino
20 28 28 Municipal Ivan
Mattia Corrado
Danna Enrica
30 17 19
Luca De Dea De Mattei Alberto Degiovanni Ilene

15 22 24 Dell'Anna Mirko
Dell'Anna Fabrizio Gabriele
Delpiano
19 15 28
Antonello Di Bello Davide Di Benedetto
29 Fasolis Alessandro Ferraro Roberto

n n n
Federica Ferri Alessandro Floris
n Foini
17 Barbara Foley Fontana Denise Amber
22
30L Miriam Frea
25 Fronticelli Alberto
25 Gaiotti Samuel
n Salvatore Garofalo
19 18
Annamaria Gazzola Valentina Gilli
n Giobergia Jessica
16 Goria Francesca
18 Graffi Michele
20 Granara Giuseppe
18 Grasso Claudia
20 Griseri Giuseppe
30 Guerriero Daniela
22 Guglielmone Luca
15 Kapper Fabricio Daniel Antonio
22 Levi Benedetto
23 Licchelli Maria Francesca
16 Lorenzi Michela
28 Maffei Federico
23 Mancini Francesca
19 Marasca Damiano Xavier
16 Mariano Andrea
25 Marino Eleonora
21 Marra Stefano
nc Martis Daniele
20 Minchiante Elisa
19 Morizio Lucia
24 Morra Virginio
20 Negro Alessandro
24 Olivero Stefania
nc Onesi Roberto
30 Oyarzabal Urrea Gabriela
20 Pavese Federico
nc Petrarulo Claudio
22 Picariello Lorena
nc Pizzolla Giovanni Polimeni
n Simone Andrea
Pomero
15 16 29
Pontrelli Alessandro Rao Daniel
n Delmarco Stephen Rella 19
Risoleti Francis
n
19 Risso Luca Luca Rizzo Borrello Peter Rhodes

n n n
Rollino Alberto Rosi Raimonda
n Rossi Giulia
29 Santià Matthew
26 Giulia Sartorelli
n Elena Scala
28 18 Slanzi
Scupola Patrizia Soddu Cristina
n / Eugenio Marco Stoppa

19 22 29
Giulia Tancredi Terzuolo
22 Daniel Valdez Sandoval Ana Isabel Valente
28 25
Andrea Vassallo Enrique Vera Monica

15 n 28 Vergnano
Vergani Vittorio Vidali Daniel Henry
27 18
Zavattaro Matthew

nc = not classified

Those who have achieved a score between 15 and 17 to be able to pass the examination must in any event, support an oral question, or (alternatively) to repeat the written examination.

Evidence supplementary oral (not mandatory for anyone) it relates to a question about the deepening personal issue or on the outline of the course (see blog): please note that this integration can also lead to a decrease of the vote in this case can not be denied, otherwise the cancellation of the entire test.

The ratifications of the votes obtained, any oral evidence and the resulting recordings will take place on the dates and places of appeals officers.

Unless stated otherwise by the students the marks obtained in this paper or in subsequent written examination (if positive) will be registered automatically to the date of the second appeal.